You can’t change a relationship without actually changing your behaviour.
There’s a reason some of our public services feel remote, unaccountable and uninterested.Many of our organisations are products of failure. They only exist because things don’t work.
Fixing other people’s problems keeps you very busy. It creates vast organisational empires and complex group structures.
On the other hand actually believing in what people can do for themselves means being brave enough to admit that you won’t always be needed. It means stepping back.
There’s a familiar theme across the social sector: demand for services is rising rapidly and citizens want more of a say in what those services look and feel like.
Whilst there’s a lot of noise about the former, there’s generally little focus on the opportunity of people wanting more influence and even control of the services they receive
. Adam Lent
writing about the NHS 10 Year Plan
points out the fatal flaw in organisational thinking :"There’s a belief that we can solve our own problems through structural, process and technological fixes rather than realizing the starting point for change is the creation of a completely different relationship with the communities we serve."This obsession with tinkering with structure, process and ‘digital transformation’ is fundamentally limiting – when instead we should be looking at a much more radical redesign of services.Adam points out that’s no sense of the need for a different and potentially difficult conversation between services and citizens about communities taking on more responsibility. Importantly “there’s no self-analysis of how a hierarchical, status-obsessed culture militates against relationships based on empowerment and collaboration”.This theme is picked up by Tony Stacey
in Inside Housing.
“Why isn’t the sector squirming right now?” he asks. Faced with serious charges about remoteness and a lack of trust the professional response seems to be: we’ll publish a new charter and make some tweaks to our code of governance.As Tony says – this on its own is not going to rebuild trust in the way we need.
We explored this in a recent Bromford Lab workshop where people spoke of a more fundamental shift being required: Democratising organisational strategy; enabling communities to have their say on how money should be spent. Starting to talk in terms of ‘collaboration’ rather than ‘engagement’. Being openly competent and building trust through relationship building and positive action, not marketing and spin. Visibly doing something with the feedback we get Doing what we say we will do and being open and honest when we get it wrong. Challenging how sectors work ‘as one’, and protect their own image.
Serious stuff. Which speaks more of a need of actually ceding power than it does of tinkering with policy.
Leading by Stepping Back
If we approach public service purely as a one to one consumer transaction we view the world through the lens of efficiency, reduced contact, metrics and performance indicators.In an economy moving towards sharing rather than just transacting we need to build a new set of behaviours based on trust and collaboration.At Bromford
we are trying to reshape our organisation around the latter. A move away from managing to coaching and connecting
.Every individual and community has assets, talents, skills and abilities. Better to focus on helping to develop and release these, rather than treating people as a series of ‘problems’ that need to be solved.
We recently agreed a set of principles that underpin this kind of relationship and I think they are useful in outlining the shift organisations may need to make.Related: Trust Is the Most Valuable Commodity in Your Organisation
It requires a change in beliefs: A belief in an adult-adult relationships. We invite feedback and challenge. We are comfortable being uncomfortable. A belief in the strengths and abilities of others. Doing more listening than talking – asking the right questions and letting people think through their options rather than advising them. We don’t judge other people’s choices. We start with the individual and take an asset based approach to coaching which is personal to them We don’t see people as needing to be fixed and we don’t collect problems.
Importantly this means we will always look to how existing strengths in the community can be built upon rather than providing services. We should never provide or support services that replace, control or overwhelm the skills within community.When people opine that the ‘system is broken’, it’s a red flag that organisations have stepped too far forward. That they are becoming omnipresent in peoples lives.Perhaps the answer lies in rebuilding organisations around communities, with a modern sense of trust and compassion.You can’t change a relationship without actual changing your behaviour.In today’s world of rising demand and scarce resources the doing, not just the talking, needs to be new and different.